Signal Scan is now the live public entry into the engine. It turns a contested claim, article, thread, transcript, post, or clip reference into a bounded first-pass case object without pretending to replace a full investigation.
Paste a claim, article, thread, transcript snippet, or clip reference. The scan returns a compact case object showing what holds, what conflicts, and what remains unresolved.
A circulated headline and post overstate what the source object actually says.
Origin-to-propagation drift and compression risk
Strong enough for correction, not strong enough for blind repetition.
A closer source review may still change how much of the public wording survives.
A speech changes meaning once event order, reaction, and later framing are restored.
Sequence conflict and chronology laundering
The object should not be treated as settled until sequence is rebuilt.
Missing timestamps or reaction links may still move the final interpretation.
A persuasive Tesla versus R8 style analogy sounds clever before the frame is actually tested.
Frame-integrity failure and category mismatch
The comparison is carrying more argumentative force than its category logic can sustain.
A deeper decomposition may still be needed if the analogy keeps driving the wider claim.
A talent-show style performance object is treated as raw authenticity despite strong packaging signals.
Packaging, framing, and mediated performance are being mistaken for authenticity.
Authenticity language is doing more work than the visible support currently justifies.
Production context may still decide whether this stays a framing warning or needs dossier depth.
A high-salience public allegation keeps attracting certainty even though the evidence remains too thin for clean closure.
Opacity, thin evidence, and pressure toward premature closure
The honest result is disciplined unresolved state, not a forced verdict.
A counter-source or stronger disclosure would be needed before the case can close honestly.
These Signal Scan examples are derived from owner-frozen March 20 case-family anchors. They show the kinds of objects the live public scan is built for without turning test fixtures into public proof.
These public examples are derived from owner-authored Civitas case material. Eval fixtures, EPI Rail specimen manifests, golden or tamper scenarios, benchmark harnesses, and Sanctuary Core validation traces are intentionally excluded.
Article, clip, or post that compresses what a primary source actually said.
Origin-to-propagation mismatch, overstatement, or reversal between the primary source and the circulated claim.
This is a public-legible first-wave case because it teaches the difference between claim origin, compression, and propagation behavior.
A compact claim map, source-role split, compression note, and next verification step.
Post, thread, or short argument built around a persuasive comparison that may break category logic.
Comparison-frame failure, category mismatch, and analogy that sounds clever before the structure is tested.
The case shows that adjudication starts with claim structure and frame integrity before evidence scoring begins.
A frame-integrity note, comparison warning, and bounded recommendation on whether the analogy survives review.
Clip, performance object, or commentary claim about authenticity, merit, or organic emergence.
Where mediated performance, packaging, and institutional framing are being mistaken for raw authenticity.
Authenticity claims often hide framing claims, so the engine has to separate presentation from support.
A framing note, authenticity-versus-packaging split, and recommendation on whether deeper dossier work is needed.
Speech clip, article, or thread where event order materially changes interpretation.
Scrambled sequence between speech, event, reaction, and later framing.
Chronology restoration is one of the engine's strongest differentiators when narrative laundering depends on sequence confusion.
A first-pass timeline, chronology conflict note, and signal that the case may need dossier depth.
High-salience claim where evidence remains partial, withheld, or too thin for clean closure.
Opacity, evidentiary insufficiency, and conditions where disciplined unresolved state is more honest than a verdict.
This case family matters because the engine has to show when withholding judgment is rigorous rather than evasive.
An unresolved state, visible evidence gaps, and a clear note on what would need to change before the case can close.
Signal Scan stays bounded on purpose. It is serious because it preserves scope, visible uncertainty, public challenge, and next-step discipline instead of overselling completeness.
If the first pass shows real complexity, move deeper. The public dossier exemplar shows what that next layer looks like before heavier proof, counter-source review, or serious case escalation enters.